Price history
Price history loads when this section approaches view.
TradingView data is temporarily unavailable
The rest of this research page remains available.
View this listing on TradingView ↗Company research
CBRE
Leasing, capital markets and critical infrastructure grew rapidly, while rising costs and a large real-estate gain made reported margin expansion less durable.
CBRE's first-quarter filing confirmed that the commercial-real-estate recovery had broadened. Revenue increased 18.6% year over year to $10.53 billion, with 4 percentage points of favorable currency effect. Advisory leasing revenue rose 20% to $1.04 billion, advisory sales increased 43% to $513 million and commercial mortgage origination increased 53% to $81 million. Critical-infrastructure revenue rose 71% to $578 million, adding a faster-growing demand source tied partly to data-center construction and operations.
The headline profit comparison was less durable than the revenue growth. Operating income increased to $511 million from $276 million, but the quarter included a $301 million gain from disposing of real-estate development assets, versus no corresponding gain a year earlier. Excluding that item alone, operating income would have been approximately $210 million. Company-defined core EBITDA increased to $831 million from $518 million, but this alternative measure also excludes several items and should not be treated as equivalent to cash generation.
Costs also grew faster than revenue. Pass-through costs represented 42.3% of revenue and largely reflected reimbursable client work. Cost of revenue excluding those amounts rose to 40.2% of total revenue from 39.1%, while operating and administrative expense rose to 13.9% from 13.4%. The recovery was therefore visible in activity, but recurring operating leverage had not yet matched the reported margin increase. CBRE had deployed $538 million to repurchase shares through April 21, adding capital allocation to a quarter already dependent on cyclical recovery.
CBRE shares returned -0.6% during the quarter, compared with 14.9% for the S&P 500. The largest daily move was a 5.8% decline on May 14, with no same-day material company filing identified in the reviewed record. The lack of positive repricing despite stronger activity was consistent with expectations already incorporating recovery or with caution about earnings quality, but the available evidence cannot distinguish those explanations. At June 30, the key test was whether recurring advisory and infrastructure fees could produce cost leverage after development gains normalized.
| Portfolio Manager | Recent activity | Shares | Value | Portfolio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William von MuefflingCantillon Capital Management LLC | CBREReduced | 181,083 | $24,390,000 | 3.67% |
| ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. | CBREAdded | 992,391 | $133,665,000 | 2.37% |
Long-term company research
Updated 2026-08-09
CBRE advises, operates, builds, finances, manages, and invests in commercial real estate. Advisory Services provides leasing, property sales, mortgage origination and servicing, and valuations. Building Operations & Experience supplies facilities and property management. Project Management handles programs, construction oversight, and cost consulting. Real Estate Investments includes investment management and development. Owners, occupiers, investors, lenders, and public bodies pay fees, commissions, management income, development profit, or performance fees.
CBRE sits between capital providers, property owners, tenants, contractors, and local markets. It turns broker relationships, property and transaction data, technical staff, procurement, and global coverage into decisions and operations. 2025 revenue was $40.55 billion: Advisory $8.84 billion, BOE $23.22 billion, Project Management $7.66 billion, and REI $879 million before eliminations. Consolidated net income was $1.2 billion.
Alternatives include JLL and other global firms, local brokers and managers, engineering and consulting firms, investment banks, general contractors, in-house property teams, and specialist software. Clients compare local expertise, data, conflicts, transaction execution, global consistency, labor and supplier management, cost savings, risk transfer, talent, and price. For investment management they compare returns, alignment, fees, and access.
Switching a broker between transactions is easy. Outsourced facilities, project, servicing, and portfolio workflows are harder to replace because staff, vendors, systems, data, and sites must transition without disruption. Global master-service agreements add scale but concentrate procurement pressure. Brand creates value through trust and access, but individual producers and local teams can move. Economic loyalty should appear in renewals, cross-service penetration, retention, pipeline conversion, and margins after pass-through costs.
Transactional revenue depends on leasing and sales volume, asset prices, financing availability, and commissions. Contractual management revenue depends on sites, scope, headcount, renewals, and pass-through work. Project fees depend on construction and infrastructure spending. Investment economics depend on assets under management, development gains, co-investment, and performance. Approximately $14.9 billion of 2024 revenue was pass-through cost; reported revenue growth is therefore not equivalent to gross-profit growth.
People are the largest economic input, followed by subcontractors, technology, occupancy, insurance, and acquisition integration. Brokerage has high variable compensation and cyclical operating leverage; facilities management has lower margin but steadier contracts and working-capital demands. Receivables and accrued compensation move with activity; warehouse lines temporarily finance mortgage loans before sale. Incremental returns can be high when existing client relationships add services, and weak when acquisitions merely add low-margin pass-through revenue or goodwill.
Employees and brokers, contractors, lenders, insurers, clients, and investment partners capture material value. CBRE retains profit where data, coordination, global coverage, and client workflow reduce transaction or operating cost.
Commercial-real-estate services are fragmented locally but concentrated globally for multinational outsourcing. Clients have negotiating power and can rebid; star brokers have labor power; technology vendors and contractors supply key inputs. Entry into local brokerage is easy; serving large multi-country portfolios, financing, regulated valuations, and investment mandates requires capital, licenses, controls, data, and reputation.
Property transactions are highly cyclical. Cheap debt raises values, development, and hiring; rising rates freeze sales and refinancing, then reduce commissions, development exits, and carried interest. Outsourcing and facilities services are more resilient but can face wage and procurement pressure. Exit from development is costly because land and construction are illiquid. CBRE's mix reduces but does not eliminate the cycle; acquisitions made near peaks can crystallize goodwill and debt before earnings weaken.
The plausible mechanism is a global client-and-data platform with local density. More transactions and managed buildings produce market information and relationships; broad services allow one client to use CBRE across leasing, capital markets, facilities, projects, and investment; global scale supports procurement, technology, and specialist talent. Mortgage servicing and long-term outsourcing embed workflows and generate recurring contact that can source advisory mandates.
This is cross-selling scale and switching cost, not a direct network monopoly. Clients multi-source, brokers can take relationships, local competitors can be stronger, and conflicts between owner, occupier, lender, and investor roles can repel customers. Proptech can improve transparency and disintermediate tasks. Durability should be tested through net revenue and segment operating profit, renewal and retention, producer productivity, cross-service wins, and returns on acquisitions after goodwill. Revenue growth dominated by pass-through cost would disconfirm the advantage.
CBRE wins mandates through local producers and global account teams; collects property and market data; advises or executes transactions; manages facilities and vendors; oversees projects; originates and services mortgages; and manages or develops assets. Shared technology, procurement, research, legal, risk, and capital allocation connect the segments. Acquisitions add capabilities and geography; integration seeks common clients and systems.
Trade-offs are material. Variable broker pay protects margins but increases talent dependence. Global standardization enables multinational service while local markets require autonomy. Subcontracting makes capacity flexible but lowers reported margins and creates safety and quality exposure. Investment and development can deepen investor relationships but use balance sheet and create conflicts. Warehouse financing supports mortgage origination while adding short-term funding. Working capital rises with reimbursable costs and delayed client collections; pushing suppliers too hard can impair delivery.
At year-end CBRE had $1.9 billion cash and $3.8 billion available under revolvers. Gross long-term debt was $5.181 billion, with only $71 million due within one year; principal included term loans due 2028 and fixed notes due 2029-2035. Short-term borrowings were $2.465 billion, mainly $1.609 billion warehouse lines secured by corresponding receivables and $852 million commercial paper. Total maturities were $2.536 billion in 2026, $332 million in 2027, $928 million in 2028, $500 million in 2029, $600 million in 2030, and $2.750 billion thereafter.
Fixed notes reduce rate exposure; term loans, warehouse lines, commercial paper, and revolvers are floating or repriced, partly hedged through interest and cross-currency swaps. Asset matching makes warehouse debt less risky than unsecured funding but depends on loan sale and collateral eligibility. Commitments include $3.677 billion operating leases, $509 million finance leases, $272 million co-investments, development funding, guarantees, and a $321 million Telford fire-safety provision.
A severe stress combines frozen property transactions, client failures, office-value declines, delayed mortgage sales, project cancellations, and facilities wage inflation. CBRE could reduce variable compensation, repurchases, acquisitions, development starts, and discretionary capex; it must fund payroll, client operations, covenants, and warehouse collateral. $5.7 billion of cash plus undrawn revolvers exceeds ordinary near-term unsecured needs, but simultaneous commercial-paper closure and warehouse disruption would strain liquidity. Goodwill, development assets, servicing rights, and co-investments are less liquid than cash or matched receivables.
Internal investment should improve producers, data, facilities technology, and project capacity where client lifetime returns exceed cost. Acquisitions must add resilient profit or cross-selling; Pearce cost $1.188 billion and J&J $819 million in 2025, increasing debt and integration risk. Co-investment can align clients but concentrates capital in the same cycle. CBRE has never paid a common dividend, retaining flexibility for acquisitions, debt, and repurchases.
CBRE repurchased 7.052 million shares for $956 million at $135.52 average in 2025. Stock-compensation expense was $120 million; shares outstanding fell from 302.052 million to 295.731 million, a 2.1% net contraction, so buybacks more than offset awards. However, repurchases and roughly $2 billion acquisition consideration coincided with long-term debt rising to $5.181 billion. Common holders benefit only if acquired and retained cash flow per diluted share grows after interest, contingent consideration, SBC, and goodwill risk; gross share reduction financed alongside debt is not sufficient.
Broker, valuation, mortgage, investment-adviser, construction, procurement, employment, privacy, AML, sanctions, antitrust, and fiduciary rules are recurring, high-probability obligations. Routine changes are moderate and reversible with controls and cost. Valuation or conflict failures are medium probability and high severity because litigation and mandate loss can persist; remediation is possible but trust may not fully return.
Project and facility safety, contractor misconduct, wage and classification rules, and building defects can create large claims. The $321 million Telford fire-safety provision shows a high-severity, long-duration, only partly reversible construction exposure. Cyber incidents are medium probability and high severity across client buildings and data. Investment underperformance or fiduciary breach can produce clawbacks and fund-raising damage. Guarantees and environmental conditions can turn advisory or development relationships into balance-sheet losses.
How value is created. CBRE applies people, relationships, data, procurement, and capital to real-estate transactions and recurring building/project workflows.
Why value can be retained. Global coverage, local density, integrated services, embedded contracts, and proprietary operating data reduce client coordination and switching cost.
Durability. Recurring outsourcing can persist, while brokerage, development, and investment economics remain cyclical and talent-dependent.
Financial resilience. $1.9 billion cash, $3.8 billion revolver capacity, long-dated notes, and matched warehouse funding help. Commercial paper, floating debt, development commitments, goodwill, and property-market correlation constrain it.
Do common shareholders receive the benefit? Net shares contracted in 2025, but per-share value depends on acquisition returns after higher debt, SBC, and contingent obligations.
The thesis would be invalidated by sustained client losses, cross-selling that fails to improve net profit, acquisitions below capital cost, a severe control/safety event, or a property downturn that couples transaction collapse with investment losses. Counterevidence includes pass-through-heavy revenue and debt-funded acquisitions. Business quality and valuation are separate questions.
Insider activity
Open-market purchases and sales only.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Price | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | Giamartino Emma E.CFO & Chief Investment Officer | Sale | 2,250 | $148 | $333,652 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-08-13 | Doellinger Chad JChief Legal & Admin. Officer | Sale | 228 | $148 | $33,810 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-05-15 | Giamartino Emma E.Officer, CFO & Chief Investment Officer | Sale | 2,250 | $131 | $294,165 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-05-05 | Doellinger Chad JOfficer, Chief Legal & Admin. Officer | Sale | 107 | $140 | $15,017 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-12 | Doellinger Chad JOfficer, Chief Legal & Admin. Officer | Sale | 116 | $130 | $15,087 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-11 | Doellinger Chad JOfficer, Chief Legal & Admin. Officer | Sale | 471 | $134 | $62,883 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-02-26 | Giamartino Emma E.Officer, CFO & Chief Investment Officer | Sale | 9,223 | $149 | $1.4M | SEC ↗ |
| 2025-11-10 | Kohli VikramadityaOfficer, COO & CEO, Advisory Services | Sale | 1,000 | $152 | $152,410 | SEC ↗ |