Price history
Price history loads when this section approaches view.
TradingView data is temporarily unavailable
The rest of this research page remains available.
View this listing on TradingView ↗Company research
VSNT
Platforms and cash generation supported the new standalone company, while distribution and advertising contraction remained structural.
By June 30, Versant's first quarter as an independent company showed that it could generate substantial cash while investing in digital platforms. It did not resolve the central challenge inherited from Comcast: linear distribution and network advertising were declining faster than Platforms could yet offset.
Revenue fell 1.1% to $1.69 billion. Linear distribution declined 7.3% and advertising 5.2%, while Platforms grew 9.5% to $192 million. Content licensing more than doubled because of agreement timing, making consolidated stability less repeatable than the headline suggested.
Adjusted EBITDA declined 7% to $704 million, though it increased 4.8% against a standalone cost comparison. Free cash flow was $558 million. Versant repurchased $100 million of shares, planned another $100 million accelerated repurchase and paid a quarterly dividend, demonstrating cash capacity but allocating capital before digital replacement economics were fully proven.
The shares fell 1.7% during the quarter, about 16.6 percentage points behind the S&P 500. Their largest daily move was a 9.9% rise on May 14, the results date. The response acknowledged cash generation, while the quarterly lag reflected the continuing structural decline in linear media.
| Portfolio Manager | Recent activity | Shares | Value | Portfolio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David EinhornDME Capital Management, LP | VSNTReduced | 1,922,172 | $69,217,000 | 1.77% |
Long-term company research
Updated 2026-08-03
Versant owns cable television networks and related digital platforms. The networks include MS NOW, CNBC, USA Network, Golf Channel, E!, SYFY, and Oxygen. USA Sports carries rights including Premier League, golf, NASCAR, and other competitions, with WNBA rights scheduled for 2026. Digital assets include GolfNow, Fandango, and Rotten Tomatoes; SportsEngine was classified as held for sale at December 2025.
The company reports one segment, but its economics are not homogeneous. Linear networks sell access to multichannel video distributors and audiences to advertisers. Sports and entertainment rights help preserve viewing and distribution value. GolfNow earns transaction, payment-facilitation, and software fees from golfers and courses. Fandango intermediates ticketing and digital entertainment discovery; Rotten Tomatoes organizes review information and sells advertising. These activities share media brands and audiences but have different competitive structures and margins.
Revenue fell from $7.445 billion in 2023 to $7.062 billion in 2024 and $6.688 billion in 2025. In 2025, linear distribution produced $4.092 billion, advertising $1.577 billion, platforms $826 million, and content licensing and other revenue $193 million. Linear distribution and advertising remained about 85% of the total, so digital platforms have not yet changed the company's economic center of gravity.
Versant is therefore best defined as a shrinking linear-media cash-flow base with smaller transaction and software options. Describing it simply as a diversified media company would obscure the dependency that matters most.
There are several distinct customers. Traditional and virtual multichannel video distributors, or MVPDs, pay per-subscriber network fees and place Versant channels in bundles. Advertisers pay for access to audiences segmented by program, demographic, and context. Viewers supply attention but often pay the distributor, not Versant directly. Golf courses, golfers, moviegoers, theaters, and digital advertisers use the platform businesses.
MVPDs possess substantial bargaining power because they aggregate households and control bundle placement. Versant's ten largest distributors represented 56% of receivables at December 2025; Comcast accounted for roughly 10% of revenue and another customer 11%. A distributor can demand lower rates, move a network to a less attractive tier, or drop it. Versant can resist only when its programming is valuable enough that subscriber loss would cost the distributor more than the fee.
Viewers can switch with almost no friction. Streaming services, broadcast television, social video, gaming, podcasts, and other leisure compete for time. Linear subscribers declined 8% in both 2024 and 2025. Network ratings fell 8% in 2024 and 17% in 2025. Contractual distribution-rate increases partly offset subscriber erosion, but higher price on a shrinking base is not evidence of growing customer preference.
Advertisers compare audience reach, demographics, measurement, targeting, and price with digital platforms and rival media. Lower ratings reduce inventory value; digital advertising only partly offsets the decline. GolfNow and Fandango customers can book directly or through rival applications. Their willingness to pay depends on convenience, inventory breadth, reliability, and user traffic rather than attachment to a corporate portfolio.
Linear distribution profit begins with a negotiated fee multiplied by paying subscribers. Annual rate escalators can raise revenue per subscriber, while cord-cutting reduces the count. Advertising profit equals sellable impressions multiplied by realized price, less sales, measurement, production, and technology cost; ratings and audience composition govern both quantity and price. Content licensing monetizes rights outside the primary channel window.
Platforms operate differently. GolfNow and Fandango collect transaction or fixed fees and, when acting as agents, recognize the fee rather than the underlying booking or ticket value. Subscription and cloud services add recurring revenue. Platform profit depends on transaction density, take rate, payment cost, technology expense, and maintaining enough supply and consumer demand to reinforce one another.
In 2025, $6.688 billion of revenue generated $1.272 billion of operating income and $930 million of attributed net income. Cost of revenue was $2.937 billion, selling, general, and administrative expense $1.469 billion, and depreciation and amortization $1.010 billion. Operating income had fallen from $2.069 billion in 2023 and $1.841 billion in 2024. Management's $2.425 billion of adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation, amortization, interest, and selected costs; it should not be confused with the residual available to shareholders.
Programming and production costs were $2.446 billion in 2025, including $1.531 billion of licensed content, principally sports, and $915 million of owned content. Contractual content obligations totaled $5.726 billion, 87% due within five years. This makes the profit mechanism a spread: distribution and advertising receipts must decline more slowly than content, operating, standalone, and financing costs.
Stakeholders capture much of the value before shareholders. Sports leagues, studios, producers, and talent receive scarce-content economics. MVPDs retain the customer relationship and part of bundle revenue. Advertisers keep value when fragmented audiences lower prices. Employees, technology suppliers, theaters, golf courses, payment networks, and creditors make further claims. Comcast received a $2.25 billion separation payment financed with debt and remains both a material distributor and a transition-services counterparty. Common shareholders receive the declining residual after these negotiated claims.
Competition operates in four connected markets. Networks compete for viewers and distribution with broadcast, cable, streaming, and digital video. All media compete for advertising budgets. Networks and platforms bid for sports rights, films, series, news talent, and production capacity. GolfNow and Fandango compete with direct booking, theater applications, search engines, and other transaction platforms.
Suppliers of differentiated content can have more bargaining power than networks. Live sports remain among the few forms of appointment viewing, attracting bidders even as linear audiences shrink. Rights agreements are long-dated and largely fixed before future ratings are known. Leagues capture scarcity rent; a network bears the risk that subscriber and advertising revenue will not cover the contract. Owned programming provides control but requires development spending and can fail to attract audiences.
Entry conditions differ. Anyone can distribute video online, so audience entry is easy. Building a recognized news brand, obtaining national MVPD carriage, funding premium sports rights, and sustaining production requires capital, relationships, and time. A booking platform needs integrations and simultaneous participation by suppliers and consumers. These barriers defend some relevance but do not stop substitutes from taking usage.
The linear-media capital cycle is not primarily physical construction. It is a cycle of rights prices, carriage terms, and audience supply. Scarce sports attract aggressive bids based on optimistic distribution and advertising forecasts; fixed obligations remain when audiences disappoint. Fragmentation then shifts budgets to digital competitors. For platforms, investment in product and marketing can attract transactions, but low switching costs allow direct channels to reclaim customers.
Versant's 2025 capital expenditure rose to $167 million from $54 million in 2024 and $56 million in 2023, largely because separation required standalone facilities and technology. That spending is not evidence of organic growth. Durable economics would require stable unit revenue after content renewal and standalone cost. Temporary contractual rate increases, separation accounting, or a short-lived sports event should not be treated as durable margin.
The strongest assets are brands, scarce rights, distribution, and specialized audience relationships. CNBC and MS NOW have established news identities; USA, Golf Channel, and the entertainment networks provide recognized destinations. Premier League and golf rights can aggregate live audiences that advertisers value. GolfNow's course relationships and transaction activity may create useful marketplace density.
The mechanism is conditional. A brand creates bargaining power only if viewers seek it out and distributors fear losing it. Ratings declines of 8% and 17% in successive years are contrary evidence. Rate increases preserved some distribution revenue, but the filings do not show that the networks can repeat increases indefinitely while subscribers fall 8% annually.
Distribution history also lowers search and launch cost, yet Comcast's continuing role complicates that advantage. The separation and distribution agreement provides near-term access, while dependence on a former parent can defer a market test of fully independent terms. Related-party revenue was $928 million in 2025, down from $1.34 billion in 2023; related-party costs were $1.24 billion in 2025. Those flows show scale and interdependence, not a self-contained moat.
Platform networks could be more durable if more courses attract more golfers, or theater availability attracts moviegoers and vice versa. The filing discloses roughly 9,000 GolfNow courses worldwide, but not enough cohort, retention, take-rate, or contribution-margin evidence to establish a strong network effect. The only retained 10-K cannot demonstrate that platform growth offsets linear decay through a cycle.
Versant must acquire or produce programming, schedule it across networks, sell advertising, negotiate carriage, and measure audiences. News requires continuous editorial operations. Sports require rights negotiation, production crews, scheduling, promotion, and coordination with leagues. Entertainment networks balance original and licensed content against expected ratings and affiliate value.
The feedback loop is demanding. Audience data should guide programming; programming must preserve distributor relevance; carriage determines reach; reach affects advertising; advertising and fees fund the next rights cycle. A weak link can compound: lower ratings reduce ad revenue, weaker revenue limits content bids, less attractive content accelerates audience loss, and distributors gain leverage.
Digital platforms require product development, payment processing, supplier integrations, customer support, cybersecurity, and search or app discovery. Recognizing only the facilitation fee when acting as agent makes reported revenue economically cleaner, but it also means transaction volume, take rate, and service cost are essential measures. The filing does not provide enough standalone platform profitability to judge whether the digital assets subsidize or consume linear cash.
Separation adds a parallel operating build. Versant must replace Comcast systems, facilities, payroll, procurement, treasury, security, and corporate services under transition agreements. Historical combined statements allocate central costs and sweep cash through Comcast. Actual standalone overhead can differ materially. Until several independent reporting periods exist, cost control and cash conversion remain hypotheses rather than observed capabilities.
The combined business generated $2.022 billion of operating cash flow in 2025, down from $2.211 billion in 2024 and $2.428 billion in 2023. Capital expenditure remained modest relative to that cash flow, even after separation spending. This suggests substantial pre-financing cash generation, but it is not a standalone free-cash-flow record.
At December 31, 2025, cash was $55 million and restricted cash $1.034 billion. The restricted funds were borrowed for the separation payment, not general liquidity. The balance sheet showed $983 million of long-term debt before the January 2 separation; additional term loans brought debt obligations to about $3.0 billion after separation, with a weighted-average maturity near five years. A $750 million revolver adds liquidity but also potential leverage.
The asset base is dominated by intangibles: goodwill was $7.611 billion and other intangible assets $924 million. The television-networks reporting unit carried about $6.49 billion of goodwill, and estimated fair value exceeded carrying value by only more than 10% at year-end. Continued cash-flow decline could create an impairment. Such a charge would be noncash at recognition but would confirm that prior expected economics did not materialize.
Content obligations are a more immediate fixed claim than goodwill. The $5.726 billion commitment cannot be reduced as quickly as subscribers can leave. Customer concentration, Comcast transition dependence, higher standalone overhead, and variable advertising deepen liquidity risk. Resilience is adequate only if legacy cash declines gradually enough to service debt, fund rights, and build independent operations.
The first allocation priority should be matching content commitments to realistic audience cash flow. Winning prestigious rights at a price that transfers all economics to leagues would accelerate decline. Management must also decide which entertainment brands merit original investment, which can harvest library value, and which platforms can earn returns independent of network promotion.
The separation began with a debt-funded $2.25 billion payment to Comcast. That transferred value to the former parent and left creditors with a material claim on a declining revenue base. It may have been a negotiated condition of independence, but it did not create programming, subscribers, or platform capacity.
On the filing date, the board had declared a $0.375-per-share quarterly dividend and authorized $1.0 billion of repurchases. Both are evidence available by the cutoff, not proof of excess capital. Returning cash can be rational if the legacy business produces more than can be reinvested at acceptable returns. It can also weaken resilience if standalone costs, rights inflation, or audience decline exceed plan.
Dual-class governance matters to shareholder outcomes: Class B shares carry 15 votes each while Class A shares carry one. Control and economic exposure are therefore not proportional. The best evidence of allocation quality will be debt reduction, per-share cash generation after content commitments, disciplined rights renewals, and transparent segment economics—not the mere announcement of distributions.
The Federal Communications Commission regulates aspects of cable programming, including program access, accessibility, children's advertising, emergency alerts, and related communications obligations. Antitrust and media-ownership rules can constrain agreements or acquisitions. Changes in carriage regulation could redistribute bargaining power between programmers and distributors.
Content creates copyright, trademark, talent, music, and contractual exposure. Sports agreements can contain complex performance, scheduling, and exclusivity terms. News operations face defamation and editorial risk. Platforms handle personal and payment data, bringing privacy, consumer-protection, cybersecurity, and state-law obligations.
The separation agreements create additional legal dependence. Tax matters, intellectual-property licenses, employee obligations, transition services, distribution, and indemnities allocate risk between Versant and Comcast. A disagreement can affect cost or access to systems and content. Because the first filing straddles the pre-separation and post-separation legal structure, the magnitude of these exposures is not yet observable through a full fiscal year.
The company's tax treatment, debt covenants, and dual-class structure also affect shareholder rights. Compliance must be assessed alongside operational independence: a technically complete separation that leaves persistent supplier, distributor, or systems dependence can still impair bargaining power.
Versant creates profit by earning distribution fees and advertising against audiences, then paying less for content, operations, standalone infrastructure, and financing than those receipts. Its platforms add transaction and software fees, but at 12% of 2025 revenue they do not yet offset the economic weight of linear television. Distributors and scarce-content owners hold significant bargaining power and may capture more of the remaining economics than shareholders.
Supporting evidence is the recognized network portfolio, live-sports rights, $2.022 billion of 2025 combined operating cash flow, and platform growth within a falling total. Contrary evidence is sharper: revenue declined in each of the last two years, subscribers fell 8% annually, ratings declines accelerated to 17%, operating income fell 39% from 2023 to 2025, fixed content obligations are large, and debt rose at separation.
An adverse case combines continued subscriber and ratings erosion, content-cost inflation, a major distributor renegotiation, weaker advertising, higher-than-allocated standalone overhead, transition failures, and goodwill impairment. Debt service and shareholder distributions would then compete with the spending needed to preserve programming and platforms.
The thesis would be invalidated if rate increases cease to offset subscriber losses; sports and production costs decline more slowly than revenue; platforms fail to produce material standalone profit; Comcast dependence persists beyond transition; leverage rises while cash flow falls; or capital returns precede balance-sheet stabilization. It would strengthen through several audited standalone years showing stable per-subscriber economics, controlled content renewals, transparent digital contribution, independent systems, declining leverage, and per-share cash durability. With one retained filing and no completed standalone year, no stronger claim is supportable.
Business quality does not by itself establish investment attractiveness; valuation depends on the price paid and the expectations embedded in it.
Insider activity
Open-market purchases and sales only.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Price | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Potter LeonardDirector | Purchase | 2,500 | $38 | $94,125 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-12 | Potter LeonardDirector | Purchase | 5,000 | $38 | $189,400 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-11 | Potter LeonardDirector | Purchase | 3,000 | $38 | $115,020 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-10 | Potter LeonardDirector | Purchase | 3,000 | $37 | $111,930 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-09 | Conway Michael AaronDirector | Purchase | 1,350 | $36 | $48,789 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-09 | HASSELL GERALD LDirector | Purchase | 10,000 | $36 | $360,700 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-03-05 | NOVAK DAVID CDirector | Purchase | 143,000 | $37 | $5.3M | SEC ↗ |