Price history
Price history loads when this section approaches view.
TradingView data is temporarily unavailable
The rest of this research page remains available.
View this listing on TradingView ↗Company research
AMAT
Foundry, logic, DRAM and service spending drove double-digit quarterly growth and better margins, while China exposure and export-control obligations remained material constraints.
By June 30, Applied Materials had stronger evidence that leading-edge logic, DRAM transitions and installed-base services were producing broad growth. Fiscal second-quarter revenue increased 11% year over year to $7.91 billion. Semiconductor Systems revenue rose 10% to $5.97 billion, and Applied Global Services revenue increased 17% to $1.67 billion as long-term service agreements and spare-parts demand strengthened.
The mix improved profitability. Gross margin increased 80 basis points to 49.9%, operating margin expanded 140 basis points to 31.9%, and operating income rose 16% to $2.52 billion. Foundry and logic represented 67% of Semiconductor Systems revenue and DRAM 29%; management attributed the growth to leading-edge manufacturing technologies and DRAM technology transitions. This was more favorable than a simple cyclical recovery because both equipment and recurring service revenue contributed.
The principal counterweight remained policy and geographic concentration. China generated $2.09 billion, or 27%, of quarterly revenue. Applied Materials paid $253 million during the quarter under its February settlement with the U.S. Commerce Department and remained subject to internal audits, training and reporting requirements; a suspended export-denial order could become effective if the company failed to comply. Evolving export controls could also reduce access to Chinese customers and accelerate local competition.
Applied Materials shares returned 111.8% during the quarter, far above the S&P 500's 14.9%; the largest daily move was a 13.4% gain on June 25. The scale of the rerating exceeded the reported earnings growth and therefore embedded substantially higher expectations for AI-related equipment demand and margins. At quarter-end, the central question was whether leading-edge and service growth could justify those expectations despite export restrictions, customer concentration and semiconductor capital-spending volatility.
| Portfolio Manager | Recent activity | Shares | Value | Portfolio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William von MuefflingCantillon Capital Management LLC | AMATReduced | 50,176 | $36,277,000 | 5.45% |
| Chase ColemanTiger Global Management LLC | AMATReduced | 1,632,210 | $1,180,088,000 | 4.92% |
| Brad GerstnerAltimeter Capital Management, LP | AMATNew | 261,950 | $189,390,000 | 1.93% |
| Glenn GreenbergBrave Warrior Advisors, LLC | AMATUnchanged | 961 | $695,000 | 0.02% |
Long-term company research
Updated 2026-08-03
Applied Materials supplies equipment, services, spares, and software used primarily to manufacture semiconductors. Semiconductor Systems sells tools for deposition, etch, rapid thermal processing, chemical-mechanical planarization, ion implantation, wafer inspection and review, metrology, and advanced packaging. Its equipment modifies, measures, and controls materials on wafers as customers build transistors, interconnects, memory structures, and multi-die packages.
Applied Global Services, or AGS, provides replacement parts, maintenance, upgrades, field service, and factory-automation software for an installed equipment base. Through fiscal 2025 it also included 200-millimeter and other equipment; that business moves to Semiconductor Systems in fiscal 2026. Display equipment and smaller activities are now reported in Corporate and Other because Display is no longer a significant reportable segment.
The customer does not buy a generic machine. It buys a process result: a film of specified thickness, a repeatable etch, accurate defect detection, higher yield, faster ramp, or lower cost per functioning chip. Applied sits between specialized component suppliers and a concentrated group of foundry, logic, DRAM, and NAND manufacturers. Its economics therefore depend on being designed into a customer's process roadmap before a factory commits to volume production.
Semiconductor manufacturers value technical capability, yield, process repeatability, throughput, uptime, service response, cost of ownership, and roadmap continuity. At leading-edge nodes, a small yield difference can change the economics of billions of dollars of fab investment. Customers consequently test tools and recipes extensively before qualification. Once a process is integrated, switching can require new experiments, recalibration, wafer loss, and delay, but each new technology generation reopens competition.
Foundry and logic customers buy equipment for advanced and mature nodes; DRAM and NAND producers require different layer, architecture, and patterning solutions. AI servers, high-bandwidth memory, and advanced packaging currently support investment, while phones, PCs, automotive, industrial, and storage demand affect other nodes. Facility readiness, utilization, financing, government incentives, and export licenses determine when an order becomes revenue.
Customers are powerful because spending is concentrated. Two customers represented about 19% and 15% of 2025 revenue. They can qualify multiple vendors, negotiate price and support, delay shipment, cancel backlog subject to penalties, or internalize some maintenance. Their alternative is not only another tool supplier; it includes extending existing equipment, changing device architecture, or postponing a fab. Applied retains value when its tool improves customer yield or time to market by more than its purchase and lifecycle cost.
Semiconductor Systems creates profit when tool price exceeds component, assembly, testing, logistics, installation, warranty, sales, and development cost. A successful platform spreads substantial research and demonstration expense across many systems and process applications. Customer adoption can generate operating leverage because engineering is largely incurred before volume; failure to win a process step can strand years of development.
Fiscal 2025 Semiconductor Systems revenue was $20.80 billion and operating income $7.38 billion, a 35.5% segment margin. Foundry, logic and other supplied 67% of segment revenue, DRAM 26%, and NAND 7%. Margin improved through revenue, customer and product mix, lower material and manufacturing cost, and higher average selling prices. Those drivers mix durable process value with cyclical scarcity and favorable mix; they should not be treated as equally persistent.
AGS monetizes installed equipment after sale. Customers buy spares, subscriptions, software, upgrades, and field labor to improve utilization and factory output. Its 2025 revenue was $6.39 billion and operating income $1.79 billion, a 28.1% margin. Service demand depends on installed systems, chambers, wafer starts, utilization, tool complexity, and long-term agreement renewal. It is more recurring than new equipment but still weakens when factories idle or customers perform service internally.
Consolidated revenue was $28.37 billion, gross margin 48.7%, operating income $8.29 billion, and net income $7.00 billion. Operating cash flow was $7.96 billion. Research, development and engineering consumed $3.57 billion, and capital expenditure doubled to $2.3 billion. Applied creates shareholder profit only after funding these capabilities and working capital; customer value may otherwise be captured by scarce component suppliers, engineers, governments offering incentives, or customers using purchasing power.
Semiconductor equipment is concentrated by process step but intensely contested. Suppliers range from global multi-product vendors to specialists and increasingly state-supported local manufacturers. Competition turns on technical differentiation, productivity, yield, cost of ownership, service, global support, and the timing of commercialization. AGS also competes with independent service firms and customers' internal maintenance teams.
Entry barriers include physics and materials knowledge, patents and trade secrets, years of customer qualification, expensive demonstration tools, specialized suppliers, global field coverage, and a record of process reliability. Yet barriers are not permanent. A rival can dominate a specific lithography, etch, inspection, deposition, or packaging step; a technology inflection can make an installed approach obsolete. Chinese policy and funding support local competitors, while U.S. controls restrict Applied's access and can give non-U.S. competitors an asymmetric opening.
Supplier bargaining power rises where a component has one qualified source. Applied primarily assembles, integrates, and tests proprietary and commercial subsystems through a distributed network. Requalifying an alternative may take time because performance must be reproduced. Customer concentration exerts force in the other direction. The resulting value pool depends on whether tool differentiation outweighs both pressures.
The capital cycle is severe. High chip prices and utilization stimulate fab construction; long lead times invite equipment and component capacity; later oversupply reduces customer spending. Technology transitions can sustain demand even without wafer-volume growth because more layers, new materials, 3D structures, process-control intensity, and advanced packaging add steps. This content-per-wafer effect is structural, but the timing of customer capacity is cyclical. Backlog was $15.0 billion at year-end, with 31% expected beyond twelve months, yet orders can be delayed or canceled and export rules can remove demand.
Applied's advantage is an integrated materials-engineering system: broad process coverage, co-optimization across steps, customer collaboration during early technology selection, proprietary know-how, a large patent portfolio, and global service near fabs. More than 23,500 active patents support the portfolio, but no single patent is essential. The mechanism matters more: early process learning can improve a customer's device before production and create a qualified tool-and-recipe position that is costly to replace during a node ramp.
Breadth can lower experimentation time when multiple steps must be co-optimized and can feed field data back into development. The installed base then supports parts and service. Scale spreads $3.57 billion of annual RD&E and a worldwide field organization over multiple markets. Observable evidence should include process wins, stable market position across transitions, service attachment and renewal, rising revenue per installed chamber, customer yield outcomes, and margins after normalizing mix.
Contrary evidence is inherent. Customers maintain alternative suppliers to protect bargaining power. A broad portfolio can dilute resources, and Display's loss of reportable-segment significance shows that scale does not prevent an end market from weakening. Export controls may strand product capability outside accessible markets, while funded local Chinese competitors can learn behind a protected market. Advantages must be re-earned at every architectural change.
Applied links customer roadmaps, research, process laboratories, supplier qualification, system architecture, assembly, integration, test, shipment, installation, recipe development, and lifetime service. Product development occurs mainly in the United States, India, and Israel; demonstrations occur in the United States and major Asian customer regions. Manufacturing and supply-chain activity spans the United States, Singapore, Japan, China, Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Europe.
The system deliberately keeps high-value design, integration, process knowledge, and customer contact while purchasing many parts and using contract manufacturers. This reduces the need to vertically produce every component, but creates dependence on qualified sources. Inventory and dual qualification protect delivery at a cost. Purchase obligations of $10.6 billion, $7.3 billion due within twelve months, show the scale of commitments needed to support demand.
Direct sales and field engineers are necessary because specifications and production problems are technical and customer-specific. AGS converts proximity into uptime and recurring sales. The trade-off is a global fixed-cost network that must be maintained through downturns. Applied also approved a workforce reduction affecting about 4% of employees in late 2025 while continuing high RD&E and capacity investment; execution must preserve scarce process knowledge.
Operating quality should be judged through lead times, supplier concentration, inventory turns, acceptance timing, warranty, tool uptime, service renewal, and new-product yield. Shipment growth without customer acceptance or profitable field performance is not success.
Applied ended fiscal 2025 with $12.9 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and investments against $6.5 billion principal amount of senior unsecured notes and $100 million of commercial paper. It had $4.1 billion of revolving capacity with no borrowings and complied with covenants. Working capital was $12.9 billion. This net liquidity and operating cash generation provide substantial downturn capacity.
Debt is long term, while the main near-term commitments are operating rather than refinancing: $7.3 billion of purchase obligations due within twelve months, a $255 million transition-tax payment due February 2026, capital expansion, inventory, and essential RD&E. Operating cash flow fell from $8.68 billion to $7.96 billion in 2025, partly because of higher tax and inventory payments, but remained above net income.
Asset stress would arrive through excess inventory, canceled tools, underused demonstration equipment, customer receivables, or obsolete technology. Applied sold $501 million of receivables without recourse in 2025; days sales outstanding was 69. A severe scenario combines foundry and memory capital cuts, export-license denials, supplier commitments, and an inability to reduce RD&E without compromising the next node.
The balance sheet appears able to fund such a scenario without immediate external capital. Resilience would weaken if management maintains peak repurchases and capacity spending while backlog falls, inventories age, and customers concentrate purchases elsewhere.
Applied allocated $3.57 billion to RD&E and $2.3 billion to capital expenditure in 2025. The latter included real property, improvements, demonstration and testing systems, manufacturing, and network equipment. These investments can deepen product advantage, but the doubling of capital expenditure must earn returns after current AI and leading-edge scarcity normalizes.
The company also repurchased $4.9 billion of shares and paid $1.4 billion of dividends. It issued about $1.0 billion of new notes while repaying $700 million due in 2025. Approximately $14 billion of repurchase authorization remained. Repurchases can increase per-share value when below intrinsic value and after funding the next process generation; authorization and aggregate cash deployment do not prove that condition.
Stock compensation and employee stock-purchase issuance reduce the net retirement effect. Acquisitions and minority technology investments should be judged by time-to-market improvement and retained economics, not strategic adjacency. The shareholder test is whether revenue and cash flow per diluted share compound after RD&E, capital intensity, dilution, and acquisitions across the cycle.
Export control is the most direct regulatory constraint on economics. China represented $8.53 billion, or 30%, of 2025 revenue, down from 37% in 2024. U.S. rules have limited products, parts, and services that Applied can provide to Chinese customers and may advantage foreign or domestic Chinese rivals. Since 2022, the company has received subpoenas from the Department of Justice, Commerce Department Bureau of Industry and Security, and SEC concerning China shipments and export compliance; it also received Justice Department requests concerning federal award applications. No loss range was estimable at the cutoff.
Other exposure includes patents, trade secrets, antitrust, anti-corruption, government funding, tariffs, customs, cybersecurity, privacy, environmental and chemical regulation, workplace safety, and product performance. Export restrictions on critical minerals can also impair suppliers. Violations could produce fines, denial orders, lost grants, license restrictions, or exclusion from customers—not merely litigation expense.
Applied reported up to $350 million of potential payments under guarantee arrangements and $293 million of parent guarantees for subsidiary banking arrangements. Management did not expect payments under the former, but these remain contingent claims. Regulation can protect incumbents through qualification and IP while simultaneously shrinking the accessible market.
Applied creates value by solving difficult materials and process-control problems that raise semiconductor yield, performance, and production economics, then monetizes the installed tools through service, spares, upgrades, and software. It retains value through early customer collaboration, qualification, know-how, portfolio breadth, and field support. These mechanisms are economically stronger than a generic claim of semiconductor growth.
The favorable case requires continued process wins in leading-edge logic, memory, and advanced packaging; AGS renewal and service intensity; price that reflects customer yield value; and capacity investment disciplined against the equipment cycle. Financial resilience is strong enough to continue development through a downturn.
Contrary evidence includes customer concentration, the diminished Display business, local competitors supported by policy, export restrictions, a sharp rise in capital expenditure, and margins aided by favorable mix and pricing. AI demand and current capacity scarcity must not be mistaken for permanent competitive economics.
The thesis is invalidated if Applied repeatedly misses major technology inflections; if customers dual-source away enough volume to erode process and service returns; if export controls permanently remove markets faster than new applications replace them; or if capacity, inventory, and repurchases consume cash through a severe spending decline. Durable value must appear in per-share cash generation across the equipment cycle, not one year's backlog or margin.
Insider activity
Open-market purchases and sales only.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Price | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-08 | BRUNER JUDYDirector | Sale | 1,000 | $465 | $465,000 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-08-25 | Hill BriceSVP, CFO | Sale | 7,500 | $479 | $3.6M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-18 | Raja Prabu G.Officer, President, Semi. Products Grp. | Sale | 10,000 | $634 | $6.3M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Iannotti Thomas JDirector | Sale | 9,250 | $600 | $5.5M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 3,675 | $597 | $2.2M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 4,028 | $596 | $2.4M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 1,125 | $595 | $669,206 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 4,726 | $594 | $2.8M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 4,782 | $592 | $2.8M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 3,515 | $590 | $2.1M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 2,412 | $592 | $1.4M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 13,505 | $597 | $8.1M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 4,457 | $597 | $2.7M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 2,426 | $599 | $1.5M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 837 | $599 | $501,656 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 4,535 | $595 | $2.7M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 5,933 | $596 | $3.5M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 4,682 | $594 | $2.8M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 15,755 | $591 | $9.3M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 9,186 | $591 | $5.4M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-16 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 10,411 | $592 | $6.2M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-15 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 3,799 | $595 | $2.3M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-15 | Nalamasu OmkaramOfficer, Senior Vice President, CTO | Sale | 6,938 | $590 | $4.1M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-15 | DICKERSON GARY EDirector, Officer, President and CEO | Sale | 11,273 | $590 | $6.7M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-15 | Deane Timothy MOfficer, SVP, Applied Global Services | Sale | 8,621 | $591 | $5.1M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-04 | Raja Prabu G.Officer, President, Semi. Products Grp. | Sale | 1,803 | $507 | $914,229 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-04 | Raja Prabu G.Officer, President, Semi. Products Grp. | Sale | 15,083 | $506 | $7.6M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-04 | Raja Prabu G.Officer, President, Semi. Products Grp. | Sale | 25,309 | $505 | $12.8M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-04 | Raja Prabu G.Officer, President, Semi. Products Grp. | Sale | 7,805 | $506 | $4.0M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-06-03 | Hill BriceOfficer, SVP, CFO | Sale | 2,500 | $499 | $1.2M | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-05-26 | BRUNER JUDYDirector | Sale | 1,128 | $450 | $507,600 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-05-22 | Sanders AdamOfficer, Corp. Controller & CAO | Sale | 268 | $434 | $116,371 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-02-25 | BRUNER JUDYDirector | Sale | 2,500 | $392 | $979,275 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-02-24 | Sanders AdamOfficer, Corp. Controller & CAO | Sale | 534 | $379 | $202,471 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-02-23 | BRUNER JUDYDirector | Sale | 1,511 | $378 | $570,992 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-02-23 | BRUNER JUDYDirector | Sale | 2,458 | $376 | $925,412 | SEC ↗ |
| 2026-02-17 | Hill BriceOfficer, SVP, CFO | Sale | 5,000 | $361 | $1.8M | SEC ↗ |
| 2025-12-01 | Sanders AdamOfficer, Corp. Controller & CAO | Sale | 609 | $256 | $155,618 | SEC ↗ |
| 2025-11-25 | Little Teri A.Officer, SVP, CLO | Sale | 4,000 | $238 | $952,960 | SEC ↗ |
| 2025-11-19 | Little Teri A.Officer, SVP, CLO | Sale | 4,000 | $234 | $936,320 | SEC ↗ |